![]() ![]() “These proposals have been conflated to address the very separate issues of the demise of Bury, the threat of the European Super League and the takeover of Newcastle United. ![]() The first is the demand for independent regulation and the second is an increased transfer levy to redistribute increased funds further down the football pyramid. In his programme notes ahead of Tuesday’s game against Crystal Palace, Kinnear wrote: “The two most significant recommendations are as flawed as they are radical. Kinnear reacted positively to elements of the review, including “increased supporter consultation, heritage shares, renewed focus for the women’s game and improving equality and diversity”.īut he criticised the idea of an independent regulator and suggested redistributing income through a transfer levy would reward “incompetence”. It also pushed for the creation of an Independent Regulator for English Football (IREF). The wide-ranging review, which was promised by the government as part of its manifesto for the 2019 general election, was released last week and called for a transfer “stamp duty” to be distributed among the pyramid. Leeds United chief executive Angus Kinnear has taken aim at plans within the government’s fan-led review of football and compared elements to “Maoist collective agriculturalism”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |